2 "Overly Dramatic" Stars
Back Cover Blurb -
Horror has a new name: introducing Courtney Alameda.
Micheline Helsing is a tetrachromat—a girl who sees the auras of the undead in a prismatic spectrum. As one of the last descendants of the Van Helsing lineage, she has trained since childhood to destroy monsters both corporeal and spiritual: the corporeal undead go down by the bullet, the spiritual undead by the lens. With an analog SLR camera as her best weapon, Micheline exorcises ghosts by capturing their spiritual energy on film. She's aided by her crew: Oliver, a techno-whiz and the boy who developed her camera's technology; Jude, who can predict death; and Ryder, the boy Micheline has known and loved forever.
When a routine ghost hunt goes awry, Micheline and the boys are infected with a curse known as a soulchain. As the ghostly chains spread through their bodies, Micheline learns that if she doesn't exorcise her entity in seven days or less, she and her friends will die. Now pursued as a renegade agent by her monster-hunting father, Leonard Helsing, she must track and destroy an entity more powerful than anything she's faced before . . . or die trying.
Lock, stock, and lens, she’s in for one hell of a week.
Micheline Helsing is a tetrachromat—a girl who sees the auras of the undead in a prismatic spectrum. As one of the last descendants of the Van Helsing lineage, she has trained since childhood to destroy monsters both corporeal and spiritual: the corporeal undead go down by the bullet, the spiritual undead by the lens. With an analog SLR camera as her best weapon, Micheline exorcises ghosts by capturing their spiritual energy on film. She's aided by her crew: Oliver, a techno-whiz and the boy who developed her camera's technology; Jude, who can predict death; and Ryder, the boy Micheline has known and loved forever.
When a routine ghost hunt goes awry, Micheline and the boys are infected with a curse known as a soulchain. As the ghostly chains spread through their bodies, Micheline learns that if she doesn't exorcise her entity in seven days or less, she and her friends will die. Now pursued as a renegade agent by her monster-hunting father, Leonard Helsing, she must track and destroy an entity more powerful than anything she's faced before . . . or die trying.
Lock, stock, and lens, she’s in for one hell of a week.
....................
Just fair warning, this review does not really contain any real
description or an overview of the book itself, I’m mainly going to talk about
why I rated it 2 stars and it has nothing to do with the storyline or premise
of the actual book, because if based solely on that, I would have given it 4
stars, but unfortunately it isn’t and obviously I didn’t.
I need to start this off by being 100%, completely honest
with you…I am NOT in the majority when it comes to my feelings and review of
this book and usually when that happens, I am so confused as to why, but in
this case I know why and it all boils down to personal taste in writing style
and for me, I just didn’t like the “dramatic flair”, if you will, that Ms.
Alameda uses all throughout Shutter.
I’m more of a call-it-what-it-is kinda gal. Sure, I enjoy descriptive phrases and edgy
adjectives just like the next person, but I don’t enjoy being beat over the
head constantly with grossly, often times silly, descriptive word use and there
came a point while reading Shutter that
I literally screamed out loud, because of my annoyance. Hmmm…let me try to better explain.
How I usually like my books to read (this is NOT a scene
that is found in the book, but an example):
"I
walked down the dirt road and admired the spring flowers that lined the
pathway. With the sun setting in the horizon,
it was a beautiful sight that filled me with a sense of peace."
Now, this is how that scene would have been described in Shutter:
"I
trudged down the soot and dust strewn course while venerating the small growths
that scored the vicinity, the ones that mother spring had birthed into existence. The sun was slowly falling into slumber and
the alluring vision it presented shepherded me to tranquil satiety."
Okay, so you get what I’m trying to say? One or two or maybe even three overly
descriptive phrases per chapter I would have been able to overlook, but three
to four a page, sometimes more, was just overkill for me and I found it rather
distracting. I wasn’t able to get lost
in the storyline, because rather than finding the writing style to be a
beautiful form of dictation, all I could think was that somebody really loved their
thesaurus. The kicker to all of this
too, is that Shutter is not some literary
genius novel or even a book that delves into emotions or scenarios that would
typically call for pretty words or flowery, over-the-top descriptions, it’s a
mystery/thriller novel that is filled with ghosts, violence and death!
Here are some real examples extracted from the book (and
these are only a few, you can find many more littered throughout the book):
"The
lights suffocated, then died and doused us in shadows". (The lights
suffocated? Really?)
"I
swung off the bike. Fog hushed the
property." (I never knew fog to hush)
"I
sensed more than saw the sun set, felt the drowned slip of the light under the
horizon." (I guess lights can drown too)
"The
door wrenched free with a bark." (Again, really?)
"I
followed Damian out into an anemic, waning night. Spindly trees lined the wide avenue, shedding
the gangrenous leaves of fall. The world
smelled terminal, waiting for winter and rot." (Wait, are we discussing the
weather or a patient in the infectious disease ward? Gangrenous, terminal and rot?)
"As
soon as I dropped into my seat, exhaustion bricked in my eyes and filled my
bones with mortar." (Seriously though, what kind of 18-year-old girl talks
like that?)
There really are just so many more examples, but I’ll stop
now, because for one, this review is getting way too long and two, it’s just
making me annoyed all over again reading these.
Maybe I’m exaggerating a bit on the whole issue, but it became such a
focal point for me, that I just couldn’t get past it. Just couldn’t and oh, I really didn’t like
our heroine in the story, so that did NOT help at all.
Overall, no, I personally do not recommend this book. The actual storyline is good, pretty great in
fact, but I couldn’t enjoy it due to the way it was written. I will reiterate my early statement though, I
am in the VAST minority when it comes to my feelings and review of this book,
so regardless of my measly opinion, there is a huge majority that absolutely
love this book and that many people can’t be wrong, right? So, if silly, over-dramatic descriptions do
not really bother you, then you might find that you will actually enjoy this
book, but for me I experienced an unfavorable assessment…in other words, for me
it was a no.
Happy reading, until next time...
No comments:
Post a Comment